|
Post by Quil on Jun 17, 2011 10:14:08 GMT -8
man owns not what he can't take with him after death.... mother earth will dictate what man can do on her..... I am starting to like my lieing ways for when i put out a good bait lie i catch a fish every time.... I know not the difference between the brain and heart but i am learning... I thought one day i could feel but now i am learning to feel with no thought... as the saying goes, think not expect not , my tupa once told me i have the heart but i think to much..... man can never out smart creator cause he thinks to much.... as for fear being todays foe , why does it not have the right to live after all it is one of deaths tools and death of a vehicle is after all life to something else is it not... we as inhabitents of mother earth have gotten so self centered we think not of our brothers and sisters anymore but ourselves , how can we co-exist with man always getting the upperhand... balance is what life is all about and once you know that harmony is sure to follow..... now i see, only i see outside myself not no-one else therefore it is what i accept therefore it will be..... for the longest time i couldnt figure out what happened to me when i was young unil i got older and started to memember what the elders of yesterday use to talk of , how tools are so important to the essence of life...
|
|
|
Post by Quil on Aug 22, 2011 10:49:32 GMT -8
:oi put this out to a pained young buck...i feel all could possibly amelionrate from the tense time's we all live with in ourselves today the world we live in is the world we live with...recognize...accept for what it is so one does not dewll in the negitive then look for change that one would love to accept to the begging of one's end.....a disheartened thought only creates a clouded target....
|
|
|
Post by Quil on Mar 20, 2012 13:53:04 GMT -8
one thing i learnt over the years is it's not the actions of how people present themselves but the emotional stability is what creates who they are...
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 4, 2012 8:00:46 GMT -8
i got a saying and that is if "i" "want" something outside myself then i "expect" and i expect nothing in life.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 24, 2012 4:54:31 GMT -8
negativity is deaths tool to help shut down the body.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 24, 2012 5:00:32 GMT -8
everything outside myself is only tools to help the growth or disengagement of my of my inner spirituality, for is not the spirit who i am?"
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 25, 2012 5:36:45 GMT -8
if i didnt see death at least once a day lurking around the corner i wondered at times if i was still on the rez
life is like a roller coaster on a hot desserts day in the confines of a rattlesnake pit, it keeps me awake with exitement every waking minute i live it.
concerning right or wrong? i wonder if bear is wrong in killing anothers offspring...or wolf for killing a whole community when moved into the area....i guess in "abc" i could see good and bad , right and wrong in all things...cause without this in todays vocabulary we wouldnt have fear perpetuated to the exent it does today...ok i get it....man is smarter then all that he lives with on mother earth.
"to teach" is to state you know whats best in someone elses life
to flow is not to restrict energy to thought as is harmony to the eye's what the hand can do.
the day i had yesterday was like putting one's hands in a fire to grab sentimental knowing the guy before you throw it in.....and now that i grabbed it i threw him the pain of words most bully's in the public find hard to walk away from.....and now i wait like a rez indian at a kkk rally....and i know bully's circling me tring to find a way in.
the minute man believes he will become wiser then mother earth is the minute he loses alls sense of who he is
man has nothing to do with the way one lives but his surroundied has everthing to do the way he will
man may believe it is he that has to change life but he is wrong because it is life that changes his vehicle not him changing life and if he doesnt comply to the surroundings it will give life to another of motherearth children through the death of his vehicle that is all.
a blind man can see better then a sighted, why ? cause he doesnt have all the distractions a sighted one does once he learns how to use his 4 other tools...just like a excentric has more of a consept of life compared to a concentric....why cause again his tunnal vision is not a hinderance as is the concentric
life is but only tense, to the dwelling of one's past, it festers and grows stronger like wind to narrow valleys from mountain tops to the oceans gates the longer one holds on to a thought of seconds ago. acceptance of what was, lifts but a light to a ever awakening rose on a hot summers day to create tomorrow chaptiqual or coyote stories for future generations to come
for the true answers we all seek is what we see as life therefore it is nothing more nothing less
did colonial his - storians ever for any time think that maybe the natives did not or was not "infatuated" about anything, but maybe was "conserned" about the way they seen thier brothers and sisters from the europes living therefore shared with them how the true way of "living" was?... and when i say "living" i refer to what tupa said to me once "to live is to be one with the heart not mind and to die is to be controled by the mind......
i see why tupa once told me to think things through is to assume you know what it is you are looking for
to live ownership is to live control and i know now that is what brought "salvation" to it's knees
at least england you recognize life dont have to have a "point" per se, therefore you are on the right track to remdemption
"why look outside yourself for answers that you have had since birth, the only thing one need's outside one self is tools on how to translate and share if you choose to become socialable in nature and become a contributing factor, and continue to use the vehicle motherearth has to offer...."
we as a species have gotten so use to looking at other's life's and how they live it , we now know not our own cause we mirror everything around us
to mimic is to not stand out, until you know what it is you mimic. to survive is to live, as to be a victim is to die....
for tens of thousands of years the indigenous people's did it wrong thank GOD the "colonial" system came in for how did we ever manage without them
people try to grasp on justifing co dependence when they are so entrenched in it they know no other
matter has substance as energy has life and a vision either shows them as unified and will continue or energy will move on and change into another form of energy.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 27, 2012 7:47:14 GMT -8
One of the biggest differences between the energy or "spirit as most see it and the "Thought of the mind" is one is the movement off of vibration or vigor were as the other is nothing other then what was created from the past ,examples are a mother with a child or a twin with a twin "i feel therefore it is" where as " i am reading this statement therefore i am computing to comprehend if i seen/heard/touched/tasted/smelt such anywhere in my past to verify from "my" conditioning that i filed in my brain the statement to be true as "I" see it. that's the separation between consciousness and sub consciousness and now today cause of re (meaning backwards) has now conditioned us to always watch our backs and not have the instinct to feel where we are going.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 27, 2012 9:41:30 GMT -8
ya I'm going to get a little soft here. DONT TAKE IT TO HEART cause i may sound like I have a little empathy cause i don't lol... although i say native is not the true essence of the America's as it seems i put it at time's. One of the biggest accrediting factors of the America's is the indigenous over thousands of years recognized cogitation or cognitive volitional living goes hand and hand with vigor to sustain life in their vehicles (bodies). They, from watching their brothers and sisters recognized life was not all about "thought" but more so about energy which was found in vibration though oscillation. The still does not give life but life is what the force of one is to another. with the Sun being the biggest force to mother earth. We shared with all that looked for the true essence of life but what we were not prepared for was how powerful the mind (memory/ past) using "Deception" could truely become over moving forward in life. The "Camera" this concept made the mind "believe" that was the vehicle or "soul" as the indigenous of the passes seen it , cause if you never experienced it how where you to know consciously what it was, the heart knew it was but Still (no life)but because the senders intent to the receiver the receiver knew there was something wrong the sender was giving but couldn't compute, so annualized it as stealing the soul. just like Religion the concept of to do harm to the body only creates death of one's vehicle then add Death is "wrong" or you do not "want" death created fear perpetuated to the exent it does today in the conscience. As long as the power's to be today could keep humans in the consciousness "the control of one's thought is by far easier then the control of one's spirit." The more and more i sit with energy all around me now "like when it is raining with thunder and lightning with the wind blowing" and go back into the sitting with the elders vehicles of the past. i am starting to See what they shared with me now. If the spirit looks to continue in the human form he/she needs to listen to and accept what mother earth has to offer. How you use mother earth today will determine what will become of you tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 28, 2012 4:26:59 GMT -8
how does one approach subject matter when one addresses to it's audience of issues one faces?
|
|
|
Post by Quil on Jun 18, 2012 6:10:46 GMT -8
it is about the heart. for the heart is life and life is the heart and anything other is just tools to help the heart put into consciousness what the sub consciousness already knows.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 16, 2014 13:06:01 GMT -8
violence with ignorance i dont support but defiance with conviction I support as well and the latter comes in many shapes and forms lol.. that being said most people live in the head now a days and so becomes negative emotion with it , until one can identify such there will always be opinion ... our ancestors lived by the heart that is the difference of today and yesteryear , until we once again get back to heartfelt we will continue to separate ourselves from being grounded to mother earth and each other.....
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 16, 2014 13:07:07 GMT -8
one of the things when i studied "Meredith" (just a little) ,is the six treaties , where is Australia? is he stating they were never in the equation? As far as the Whiskey ring goes....now i forgot what i was going to state. but never the less. As long as we keep to the english dialect and name we are S.O .L on true standing.. as well most treaties were nil and void right off the get go because of Augustus false indocterins when rome was created it was created under duress itself .....δῆμος κράτος translated people power which was supposedly to take away ἀριστοκρατία "rule of an elite". While theoretically these definitions are in opposition, in practice the distinction has been blurred if was created at all. Cleisthenes was said to be "the father of Athenian democracy.He was a man of great practical wisdom and was one of the seven sages of antiquity. but how could one have created democracy when one created or granted democratic citizenship to an elite class. Edgar Allan Poe's words, "the glory that was Greece, the grandeur that was Rome!" These ideals were preserved and imitated by the Romans.Octavius I am sure changed such dialogue of Plato to a extent. that been said the Great Aristotle a student of Plato had to of recognized the separation of thought over spirit do to a lot of Socrates work. yet if it wasn't for The Clouds Aristophanes play The Babylonians could of got control of the world a lot sooner... i mean most of what one reads today is not truth to the flow of energy .. it is thought that dictates our lives ... Socrates translated truth to life is "Ordinary people seem not to realize that those who really apply themselves in the right way to philosophy are directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death." why? because of another quote translated "To know, is to know that you know nothing. That is the meaning of true knowledge." If you follow the paths back even the dates dont line up oldest being Cleisthenes the true father of "Democracy" then Socrates,plato, Aristotle now Aristotle even though he was a student to Plato the dates don't jive ,as well Augustus himself the creator of Rome has a laps between Christianity and the cult of Augustus ... then we get into creatio ex nihilo, ex nihilo nihil fit .. created out of nothing , out of nothing comes nothing. moving to the years of Christianity ..."Unbelievers deserve not only to be separated from the Church, but also... to be exterminated from the World by death." - Thomas Aquinas (1271) 1302 Unam Sanctam ("The One Holy") then "Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus" (there is no salvation outside the Church) and with those in place now 1452 Dum diversas (reduce any Muslims, pagans and other unbelievers to perpetual slavery) then in 1455 Romanus Pontifex ("The Roman pontiff") or for a better term Sanctifies the seizure of non-Christian lands discovered during the "Age of Discovery" and encourages the enslavement of natives. and for the grand closure 1493 Inter caetera ("Among the other") so as far as i am concerned the past is just a creation of just another rabbit hole and there was some where i found or someone else found the true meaning to treaty and it is not what we have been conditioned to believe, it is a fake word in on itself ....The terms a priori ("from the earlier") and a posteriori ("from the later") are used in philosophy (epistemology) to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument: now this was created because ...Philosophy does not promise to secure anything external for man, otherwise it would be admitting something that lies beyond its proper subject-matter. For as the material of the carpenter is wood, and that of statuary bronze, so the subject-matter of the art of living is each person's own life. - Epictetus who i believe transferred plato's work immensely to help push the envelope for one to stay in the head ...
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 16, 2014 13:09:07 GMT -8
when inveigle is the norm of indoctrination how is one not to see which one lives if they or "society" has no clue how the system is the system today.. accountability? even the dialect has so many different meaning, i am surprised most can remember their own names lol.. then Socrates work changing Aesthetics if so we should choose to use such a word into the now more physiological accepted word of the day "Ethic's" . until we truly know the origins of what we speak using the ABC's i feel we should scrutinize it's intent before we pull it forward onto another.. for if we choose to not look further into the use of such words then ,Hegel's dialectic goes hand and hand with english and it's ABC's, which manipulates us into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time we fight for or defend against an ideology we are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels' grand design to advance humanity into a dictatorship of the proletariat.
|
|
|
Post by Quil on May 16, 2014 13:10:13 GMT -8
It is proven we live in a Greco-Roman cultural foundation which has been immensely influential on the language, politics, educational systems, philosophy, science, art, and architecture of the modern world. So in reality we still live in Rome.. Doctrine of discovery proves such, with that,." Educating the mind without educating the heart is no education at all." Aristotle....now yes to translate the foundation of Aristotle is some what ambiguous because his story states he spoke classic latin yet "rome" took most of it's symbolism from ancient Babylonian times and Thales of Miletus, in Ionia which was a commercially developed Greek colony in Asia Minor and had close contacts with the relatively advanced peoples of Egypt and Babylonia. now English is a form of Frisian. Frisian was known as a low frequency based language most people found it hard to cipher what one stated. So the powers that be at the time mastered it and once that was done gave it to the general sheeple to teach why? To manipulate the masses to stay in the head instead of feel everything that is said ... English and English symbolism gets one to think, sometimes gets one to change thought process, i want, to i need or vice versa,....basically English pushes the envelope to change tides in one self "direction" creating confusion. the master of english is Latin , just go into a courthouse and you will see this is so....a writer once stated ..A naïve observer would be forgiven for assuming that the field of language evolution would, in terms of its scope and methodologies, look much like the field of evolutionary psychology,but with a particular emphasis on language. However, this is not the case.Discussion as to the origins and evolution of language predates Darwin, but so unscientific did the 19th-century establishment find these speculations that further inquiry was banned (Banned? mmm).. Thomas C. Scott-Phillips.. when you live in a Cognitive dissonance heteronomy ambiguously proselytized Greco-Roman cultural of Oligarchy dictatorship i am sure Hegel's dialectic lives strong in that... Most go after a problem without really looking at who created "facts" and are they truly credible to the "commoner" or is it just because of symbolic conditioning most now follow the "norm" sort of speak because because of being conditioned to live a heteronomy way of life. Now lets take "law" into the equation... first of all De Facto is De Facto which the world was built on. .It shows in his story right to roman times.. which shows Augustus is seen as the major contributing factor in the transformation of the roman state into a De Facto monarchy.... It is a principle of diplomacy that one must know something of the truth in order to lie convincingly. -Tom Clancy......Now here is some case "law" to back up truth Natives were always on turtle island or this would of never been the "laws" findings......Delgamuukw v BC and williams cases prove Natives have title but not ownership in canada, and United States of America v. Consolidated Wounded Knee stated Neither can this court supply a casus omissus in a treaty, any more than in a law." as well attorney general of canada -v- the attorney general of nova scotia and the lord nelson hotel case 1950 the decision was made that both federal and provincial legislation are to different entities therefore could not delegate to one another , now remember native is considered "federal"...as well it was stated Worcester v Georgia, indian land is indian land and the courts can't impose their laws onto natives.. these cases alone show there has to be true standing to the natives rights to the land for time immemorial...or there would of never been such decisions in law..... and as far as "fact" goes here is another case ... now one of the best known players of words is United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876) a lot of blacks died over that one and [CRUIKSHANK] PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Facts, by themselves are, of course, not history. Historical materials or documents, standing alone, are not history. They must be organized elaborated, and combined. This must be done with the proper spirit and in a judicial manner.Without a knowledge of psychology, how can history be properly understood or written? How can the facts be justly appreciated? How can the characters of the chief „actors“ be fairly estimated? The motive forces of human history must be found in the moral constitution of humanity. How great is the difficulty of forming a equitable judgment of the actions of public men when private emotions as well as reasons of state are found to influence them, and their actions may appear to result as much from private inclinations as from national policy. The word history entered the English Language in they say 1390 with the meaning of „relation of incidents, story“. In Middle English, the meaning was 'story“ in general. The restriction to the meaning 'record of past events“ arose in the late 15th century.
|
|